LXDE as the standard 'reference' window manager?

Non-tech-support topic may be discussed here. Discussions on religion and politics are not allowed. This area is intended for fun and community building, not arguments; Please take those elsewhere.
bradleyrose
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2019 5:20 pm

LXDE as the standard 'reference' window manager?

Postby bradleyrose » Sat Aug 24, 2019 5:21 pm

Linux and other X11 desktop environments would benefit from better standardization by having a "reference" window manager. That used to be 'twm'. My understanding is that the LXDE goal is be a standards-compliant window manager, including the new Freedesktop.org specs, but without unneccessary junk. Maybe it would be a good place to collaborate with other window-manager developers as a common place to work out the details for the X11 desktop standards. OTOH, wm developers often get involved because they have their own vision of how the X11 desktop should evolve.

Rex Bouwense
Posts: 1022
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 5:44 pm
Location: Sierra Vista, Arizona USA
Contact:

Re: LXDE as the standard 'reference' window manager?

Postby Rex Bouwense » Sun Aug 25, 2019 1:47 pm

Thread was moved to LXDE Cafe as it does not ask for assistance and is expressing an opinion
Rex
Lubuntu 18.04

drooly
Posts: 554
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:45 am

Re: LXDE as the standard 'reference' window manager?

Postby drooly » Mon Aug 26, 2019 5:46 am

bradleyrose wrote:Linux and other X11 desktop environments would benefit from better standardization by having a "reference" window manager. That used to be 'twm'.
and it still is. Still maintained.
But I'm not quite sure what "reference" is supposed to mean here. Do you mean a fallback?

My understanding is that the LXDE goal is be a standards-compliant window manager

LXDE is a desktop environment, not a WM.
Openbox is LXDE's window manager.
including the new Freedesktop.org specs, but without unneccessary junk.

That spec isn't so new anymore, and it's not "included", LXDE aims to comply with it (and include a few utilities that are deemed necessary for that).

Anyhow, it makes sense to have a fallback X.org environment that is low on dependencies.
Compare:

Code: Select all

twm:
Depends On      : libxmu

openbox:
Depends On      : startup-notification  libxml2  libxinerama  libxrandr  libxcursor  pango  imlib2
                  librsvg  libsm

The dependencies of the whole LXDE desktop are MUCH larger than those for openbox.

Maybe it would be a good place to collaborate with other window-manager developers as a common place to work out the details for the X11 desktop standards.

I think people are turning more and more towards wayland development nowadays.
Wayland has a window manager "built in" AFAIU. Maybe that's the "reference" you're looking for.

tl;dr: I don't think you'll ever get a complete desktop environment to be the "reference" environment of a GUI server.


Return to “LXDE Cafe”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests